Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BattleMaster (second nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. -Docg 01:01, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BattleMaster (second nomination)

BattleMaster (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

The first nomination was kept because the game exists- this was literally the only argument presented. I could not find any secondary sources to verify anything. Doesn't appear to meet WP:WEB. Google turns up no secondary sources (I had to filter out a board game). Everything I found was a forum or submit-a-review type website. Wafulz 04:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - does not appear to meet WP:WEB standards. I couldn't find anything either. Prove me wrong people! --Haemo 05:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - It's a game, it's been around for 5 years now. I can't really see how WP:WEB rules are broken since this is more of a video game than a website. Wikipedia is a better encyclopedia for having the article. Shrumster 08:48, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
    • WP:V still applies. --Wafulz 18:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of notability. If anyone thinks otherwise, they need to quickly establish notability with verifiable sources in the article. Wryspy 11:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. PresN 06:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless notability asserted and sourced. --Alan Au 17:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I believe most of it is verifiable using the game itself as the source, but it doesn't seem to pass notability muster. — brighterorange (talk) 17:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP:WEB. Gameogre isn't notable enough to be a source, and searches turn up nothing. I'm not sure if having a wiki makes it notable either Da Big Bozz 16:58, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep It is worth keeping since it is a game with a substantial number of players and which has its own Battlemaster wiki, I know it exists since I have had an account on it twice although I do not at the moment.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.