Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barruf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 22:11, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barruf

Barruf (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Neologism, no relevant google hits. Nekohakase 18:10, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Completely unreferences, and non-notable term. Given the bad writing and incoherency of the article, possible nonsense speedy delete. --Jimmi Hugh 18:32, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Certainly reads like nonsense. Also it's a (misspelled) copyvio from http://www.omertaa.org/volumes/volume20071/volume20071.html, "Omertaa, journal for Applied Anthropology, was launched in January, 2007". Surely speedy delete is appropriate. Flapdragon 16:10, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.