Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrie Williams

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^(?!?) 20:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barrie Williams

• Seems not notable enough to have an individual page dedicated to this man. I suggest a merge or deletion -- Ethii 01:39, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO. Possibly also redirect to Tracey Temple, his girlfriend--TBCTaLk?!? 01:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable former boyfriend of the diary secretary of the First Secretary of State. Even the obligatory affair between the latter two does not save this one. Ted^Talk/_{Contributions} 01:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk 04:26, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, quite frankly this is so NN it doesn't even merit a merge. Alphachimp ^talk 06:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge this bit player into the Tracey Temple or John Prescott article. --Nscheffey^(T/C) 07:22, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per User:Nscheffey. David L Rattigan 08:48, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, falls well short of WP:BIO unless you take a very liberal reading of "involvment in newsworthy events".--Isotope23 12:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unnotable. Green caterpillar 02:39, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Inner Earth 16:44, 30 June 2006 (UTC)
• It is notable, because of the nature of the comments that he has given with regard to this heavily publicized controversy. Comeon, guys, apply the same yard stick to all celebrities -- R7 2 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.