This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was speedily deleted as part of vandalism
We have a perfectly good article at Barrett's Esophagus. This is silliness. If there is a grounds on which this can be speedied, I'd welcome it. In any case, Delete -- Jmabel | Talk 04:42, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)
speedy deleted as part of vandalism of several pages by user:166.94.6.40. Mikkalai 04:59, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.