Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barrel Oak

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was merge into Bialowieza Forest. Mailer Diablo 16:21, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Barrel Oak

Group up for deletion: Barrel Oak, Dominator Oak, Emperor of the North Oak, Emperor of the South Oak, Great Mamamuszi Oak, Southern Cross Oak, The Guardian of Zwierzyniec, The King of Nieznanowo, Tsar Oak.

Nothing about these trees makes them any more notable than any other Oak tree in the world. One other article about a tree in the same forest which has some sort of historical significance, Jagiełło Oak has not been put up for deletion. OzLawyer 22:45, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Mergewith Bialowieza Forest or Delete--Nick Y. 23:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into parent forest article. One of the other tree articles was AFDed back in March: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Congress Oak. I think I even pointed out that there were a dozen other articles about specific trees made by the same author - not sure why I did not follow up. Old age. I've mellowed with tenure, hence the merge and not outright delete. Kuru ^talk 04:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge as above. And I can't believe no one has pointed out this bit - it's a dead tree! An article about a dead tree. A tree. Dead. A dead tree. Shenme 05:32, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.