Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barnaby Wynter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. - Likely vanity page. No evidence of notability. Absent a clear consensus to keep, non notable or marginally notable BLP articles should be deleted. Therefore delete. (the barest bits of bio could be added to his father's bio if desired, if it had such a section) ++Lar: t/c 04:45, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Barnaby Wynter

Barnaby Wynter (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC. No evidence of coverage in third party reliable sources, and notability is not inherited. Contested PROD. The JPS^{talk to me} 11:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete - per WP:MUSIC X Marx The Spot (talk) 11:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Judging by the article and the talk page comments, I wouldn't be surprised if this was a vanity page.--Drat (Talk) 11:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.  Esradekan Gibb  ^"Talk" 13:57, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:40, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom NN total vanity article unsourced and unreferenced Dreamspy (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Bardin (talk) 14:37, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete -- the criteria in WP:MUSIC are clear and the authors have not explained how any of them is met Mooncow (talk) 16:17, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.