The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. enochlau (talk) 06:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
I think this is a hoax; If it's not, then it's original research. Tom HarrisonTalk 21:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete unless original author provides a reference, I sent User:Closborne a message regarding the article just in case, I doubt it's real, though, Google gave me nil on the subject. Obli (Talk) 22:02, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
Delete as per nom TheRingess 22:04, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.