Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardicledar

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. — Trilobite (Talk) 15:27, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bardicledar

Non notable. Zero Google hits. --TheParanoidOne 16:30, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Who wrote it? Are they local to the area? If they are then it's a valuable iece of local information. Perhaps merge it with a more general article though. It could be incorporated into the Charlton article possibly. Celestianpower 16:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, not verifiable, possible hoax/attack. -- BD2412 ^talk 19:05, 2005 Jun 5 (UTC)
• Merge if true. Delete if false. Sonic Mew 20:02, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverifiable. --Tabor 20:36, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete whether true or not. Not even Wiktionary-worth, this is what some people call some other people's language? How is that encylopedic content? RickK 21:53, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete anything that has 0 google hits. --Barfooz (talk) 22:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

That's a pretty dodgy policy. Just because Google hasn't found it doesn't mean it doesn't belong here. ··gracefool |☺ 08:00, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep and merge. It is verifiable. Just not yet verified. ··gracefool |☺ 08:00, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.