Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banjo Story

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Beck. Some content already there, if willing to merge some more you'll find it in 'history' - Nabla (talk) 11:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Banjo Story

Banjo Story (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

An early Beck demo. Yes, Beck is notable. This album is not. It was never released, so it requires substantial coverage in reliable sources. I found two reliable sources, both mere mentions. After the prod, the original editor added another, also just a mention. Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Early unreleased demo, thus fails WP:MUSIC guidelines for albums. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 15:05, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 15:35, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to comply with the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

  Comment. Pasting in your standard comment doesn't help with this one. Citations from reliable sources are in the article to comply with the verifiability policy. The issue here is whether there is substantial enough coverage to provide notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:54, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

  Fair point. Merge per Divinediscourse. Stifle (talk) 11:38, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

• Merge into Beck article.Divinediscourse (talk) 19:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment - Nothing to merge. The only sourced material in the article -- the title and existance of the "album" -- is already in the Beck article. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

• Redirect to the main Beck article. So Awesome (talk) 15:12, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
• Redirect to Beck. The article in question cannot stand as it is, and the significant parts are already there in the target article. B.Wind (talk) 03:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.