Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banjax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Banjax

Appears to be a non-notable company that does not meet WP:CORP. 1160 Google hits, 0 sites linking to it (aside from itself and a Wikipedia mirror), no Alexa data. Rory096 04:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

• delete per nom and per WP:VANITY, the author appears to be one of the key players, has done very few unrelated edits, and hasn't edited since Aug 2005. We may want to include the animated series, Gene-Fusion as well, I would support that. -MrFizyx 05:21, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nope. Not enough productions yet (only 3 cartoons), although they do have job vacancies for animators. Tyrenius 05:34, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nont-notable.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 05:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Niether the company or the couple of other definitions of the word at the top of the page seem notable enough for Wikipedia. Zaxem 05:43, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a non-notable company, as per WP:CORP.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  07:31, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. DarthVader 10:05, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I was going to say paper-thin weak keep, but then I discovered that the page is filled with randomcrapcruft. This page needs to be...er..."banjaxed", so to speak. M1ss1ontomars2k4 23:30, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as above. A7. "Chief Cook" huh? ~Kylu (u|t) 20:00, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.