Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bandazian
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:49, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Bandazian
Notabilty claimed by winning competition set by local recording studio. Speedy and maintentence tags removed by article's creator Richhoncho (talk) 21:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Only the slightest shred saves it from A7 (the sources at the bottom; not quite substantial enough). Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 16:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel J. Leivick (talk) 02:06, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Fails WP:BAND by a mile; besides, creators can't remove speedy deletion tags -- BlastOButter42 See Hear Speak 02:54, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Strong delete WP is not myspace for a band which appears to fail every single criteria in WP:MUSIC. Even the coverage in the Asheley Citizen-Times (who they?) fails to bring up any important elements which support the band's assertion of notability. Ohconfucius (talk) 03:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Delete WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:51, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.