Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Band-demonica
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETE. Harro5 07:34, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Band-demonica
Non-notable WP:BAND WP:SPAM Self-produced, self-released, self-PR and to top it all, couldn't actually get the title of the article usefully correct for their purposes. --Richhoncho 22:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 12:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy A7. No assertion of notability. Fails WP:BAND in any case. Tevildo 12:52, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a non-notable band. 3 self-produced albums and nothing about chart positions, national tours or notable members. Better off on Myspace until notable status is achieved. (aeropagitica) (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per CSD-A7. Wikipedia is not MySpace's music page. --Coredesat talk 21:09, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as no assertion of notability and obvious vanity. —EdGl 21:42, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete I made this page as a place to store our biography, because I thought it would fit under the category of bands. After reading the deletion policy more closer, i see my mistakes, and hope I have not annoyed anyone too much! Sorry for my mistake. You may go ahead and delete this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Demonica (talk • contribs)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
