Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banco de Cuba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 18:10, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Central Bank of Cuba

There's no such thing as the "Bank of Cuba". It's actually called the Central Bank of Cuba. Alr 00:05, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Rename Banco Central de Cuba, the name used on the official webpage. Bkwillwm 00:23, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
  • I'll do that now. Still, in it's current form, this article is a dicdef. Alr 00:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cuba-related deletions. -- Rob 01:39, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep may be very short at the moment, but surely both encyclopedic and capable of expansion without much difficulty. Dicdefs should not necessarily be deleted, providing they are likely to expand into more than just dicdefs. PatGallacher 02:03, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, major national institution. Should remain in English as this is English Wikipedia. Gazpacho 02:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Terence Ong ^Talk 03:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• SPEEDY KEEP Basically what the nominator is asking for is a move, which AfD is not needed to do. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 03:42, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, per PatGallacher. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:04, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per CanadianCaesar - the nomination intended a move, not a delete, and there have been no delete votes cast. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per CanadianCaesar. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-02 10:29Z
• 'KEEP I'm unsure if this meets the speedy keep criteria --Chazz88 12:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per the copyright notice on their official site [1] Put a redirect on the Spanish/Portoguese name. We're an English Wikipedia. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:45, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, obviously notable. I'm not sure about the direction of the redirect; Category:Central banks appears to show that there isn't a clear policy in this specific field. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 13:26, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.