Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balti and Havana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 11:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Balti and Havana

Balti_and_Havana (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

This strikes me as both an advert and a possible copyright violation. What do others think? Postcard Cathy 11:38, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. They have a tasteful webpage ([1]), but I don't see notability. Stammer 15:53, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 05:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Absent questions of notability, there are no sources of any kind, no links, and the article seems to consist entirely of original research. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Orphic (talk • contribs).
• Delete: unsalvageable ad copy from a single purpose user. Mangoe 13:23, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I think relisting was unnecessary... there's little to discuss... just make it go away. Tomer^talk 22:35, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.