Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ball bag (BDSM)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 03:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ball bag (BDSM)

Ball bag (BDSM) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Un-encyclopedic, unsourced for many months ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete This article makes me cringe for more than one reason. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 04:13, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. WP:IDONTLIKEIT is not a good reason for deletion. I don't think it's any less encyclopedic than dildo, but just harder to find cites on, and at the moment fails WP:V. If citations are added I may lean towards keep.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 18:18, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete unless sourced. You can find them for sale, but not much seems to have been written. We are not a directory of leather items or bondage gear. --Dhartung | Talk 11:45, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Exterminate per above comments. RedZion^X 18:05, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, redirect to Cock and ball torture - It's essentially an article about a device to accomplish CBT, but I doubt the content would ever be enough to warrant a separate article even if sources could be found. -- Y|yukichigai (_ramble argue ^check) 03:43, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.