Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baker Cube

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:25, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Baker Cube

hoax or OR - I've never heard of this or its allegedly notable author, and Google produces nothing except mirrors JQ 01:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete NN. Dionyseus 02:50, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "notable economist Scott Baker" is not notable enough for a Wikipedia article it would seem, and neither is his theory. No evidence of notability given. -Elmer Clark 03:11, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — per nom. NN and possible WP:NEO. SynergeticMaggot 03:46, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• All three editors above are missing the point. The notability of the author is wholly irrelevant. The relevant criteria are mentioned in the first three words of the nomination. The article cites no sources for this purported economic model, and, like John Quiggin, looking I can find no sources. This article is unverifiable. That is the policy per which we delete hoax theories. See WP:HOAX, which explains this. Delete. Uncle G 10:37, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unverifiable Dlyons493 Talk 16:39, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:HOAX, some sort of pseudoeconomics nonsense. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:53, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.