Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bak et halleluja
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 18:05, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bak et halleluja
A song not released as a single, only claim to notability is that it is used in a Macromedia flash clip. Song not mentioned in our Kaizers Orchestra article. Article reads like an ad for the flash clip. Eivindt@c 06:11, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Song is mentioned on Kaizers Orchestra. Though still not notable enough to merit its own article as per WP:MUSIC/SONG, so Delete --TBC
??? ??? ??? 06:21, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep, at least verifiable. --Soumyasch 06:25, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- okay, Delete--Soumyasch 06:47, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment, though verfiable, the guideline, WP:MUSIC/SONG states that " a song is definitely notable if it meets any one of the following standards: it has won a major award; it is an official anthem of a notable state, region, province or territory; it is a musical standard (e.g. a pop or jazz standard); or if its a folk song, hymn or Christmas carol with a documented history of more than fifty years". As far as I know, the nominated article doesn't meet any of these requirements --TBC??? ??? ??? 06:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
- Comment, though verfiable, the guideline, WP:MUSIC/SONG states that " a song is definitely notable if it meets any one of the following standards: it has won a major award; it is an official anthem of a notable state, region, province or territory; it is a musical standard (e.g. a pop or jazz standard); or if its a folk song, hymn or Christmas carol with a documented history of more than fifty years". As far as I know, the nominated article doesn't meet any of these requirements --TBC
- Delete as utterly non-notable. Stifle 22:57, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
