Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baggage Airline Guest Services

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Opabinia regalis 05:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Baggage Airline Guest Services

Baggage Airline Guest Services (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

non notable corporation, prod removed Brianyoumans 19:11, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

  • This page has existed since 25 Sept 2005. Merge with a page about running airports? Anthony Appleyard 19:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge and Cleanup. Reads too much like an advertisement. Perhaps there are other similar services in the country? Perhaps I'm missing something, but I'd think a new subheader under Airport#Attributes would be the best place for a general description of this service. ~~ Meeples (talk)(email) 20:01, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep This article is linked from several other pages (most notably, Walt Disney World and provides valuable explanation for services offered there and by a number of airlines. For that reason the article is encyclopedic rather than advertising. Wikipedia would be a poor place to advertise such a company anyway. Another alternative would be to create a article on the kind of services run by Baggage Direct and BAGS. This information definitely doesn't belong in a page about running airports though a link from such a page would be appropriate.

Additional references have been added to the article. --Rtphokie 00:48, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete or Rewrite and Merge into a generic article. Existence of links is in and of itself not a reason to keep. Company fails WP:CORP. Vegaswikian 09:08, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:36, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Bigtop 00:45, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - no evidence from reliable sources that the subject meets WP:CORP. MER-C 06:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete no evidence presented that this company meets WP:CORP. Guy (Help!) 13:53, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete No independent sources at all, hence can't meet WP:CORP. Article says little to suggest that waiting would be fruitful,, but if WP:RS sources are provided will revise my view. --Shirahadasha 02:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I don't think so, Tim. ~ Flameviper 21:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.