Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad taste

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Keep. Scimitar 16:39, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bad taste

Non-encyclopaedic. Little scope for expansion. --TheParanoidOne 22:55, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Abstain if expanded; otherwise, Delete, since Wikipedia is not a dictionary -- CanadianCaesar 23:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, notable concept in aesthetics and humor. Kappa 01:01, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: Thanks Kappa, you hit on why I would abstain, because it could be a notable article; in fact, I believe it has been a bit expanded since I voted. In my opinion it could benefit by having a history and examples, and it probably needs a redirect from poor taste. -- CanadianCaesar 01:30, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: No encyclopedic potential? There is an entire Encyclopedia of Bad Taste. ISBN 0060921218 and ISBN 0060164700 --Tabor 02:18, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep per Kappa. -- CanadianCaesar 02:57, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Mike H 02:59, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; lots of potential. Antandrus (talk) 05:01, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. Notable topic with potential. Capitalistroadster 00:40, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Goatse Klonimus 04:47, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.