Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacon and eggs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 12:17, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bacon and eggs

• Delete - Imformal, not a true entity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe Schmit (talk • contribs)

• Keep very common expression, gets 300k hits on google [1] -- Astrokey44|talk 04:13, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Very common in the UK at least, noteworthy. Watch out for redundancy with Full English breakfast though. Robin Johnson 16:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as dicdef. Unless the article can have more content than "It is bacon and eggs and a lot of people eat it." Peyna 19:51, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I don't want an article for every possible meal, not even Steak and potatoes Ruby 20:11, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep but who cares when it became popular in the US? Jcuk 20:53, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Common meal. Englishrose 20:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep should be included on Wikipedia High Plains Drifter 21:05, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Neat little article. Golfcam 00:00, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Every possible meal doesn't have to be included but bacon and eggs has enough cultural significance to be included. Crunch 00:39, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep very culturally significant here in Britian. Essexmutant 13:36, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete and take Bacon butty and Chip butty with it while you're doing it. I am a Brit but don't believe that putting bacon and eggs together on a plate is "culturally significant". This is cruft of some sort or other, border line orignial research. There is no need for articles like this where regional preferences are given some kind of false prominance. doktorb | words 11:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.