Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backyard wrestling link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 16:58, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Backyard wrestling link

This article is currently marked as copyvio, but I think should be deleted based on lack of encyclopedic content. The content is about online community, posted from its site. Conscious 08:15, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as self-promotion, advocacy, advertising. Author is also owner of said web pages. External links and references all go to his page. Question notability. No context, or verifiability of claims. Tychocat 08:57, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete Vanispamcruftisement. Jammo (SM247) 09:47, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable, fails WP:VAIN. --Coredesat 10:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, for reasons cited in delete summary above. Antonrojo 14:11, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Very strong delete for reasons above, especially about being unnotable and like an advertisement. Green caterpillar 17:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

There is NO need to delete this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.166.150.28 (talk • contribs)

• Delete as per above, fails WP:WEB, article now sports a copyvio notice. Actual site this article refers to has renamed itself because (quoting its own homepage): "F**k The Backyard Wrestling Link! I am getting so tired of people telling me they will not join my site because of the bad reputation the Link had in 2002." This seems to acknowledge a low and pretty shabby notability all by itself. --DaveG12345 21:32, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Appears to be non-notable vanity, created by the author in order to expand his audience. I would also question the POV. tmopkisn ^tlka 23:31, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.