Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backlog

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. BLANKFAZE | (что??) 21:04, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Backlog

Dictionary type entry - I've created it on Wiktionary Wiktionary:Backlog, not enough content to be an encyclopedia article. Greenman 14 March 2005

• The m:transwiki process has not been correctly performed. There is no mention of this article being transwikied in either the Wikipedia:Transwiki log or the Wiktionary:Wiktionary:Transwiki log, and edit history has not been recorded in the new article. Keep. Uncle G 10:29, 2005 Mar 15 (UTC)
• Keep, encyclopedic topic. Let it grow. Grue 18:59, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, nothing to expand. Edeans 04:14, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• One can have backlogs of all sorts of things, from national parks maintenance, through stocks and shares to be sold, to Wikipedia articles. This is far too general a word to match a specific topic by itself, and unexpandable without something to relate to. Delete. Uncle G 18:10, 2005 Mar 18 (UTC)
• Delete Kevin Rector 20:03, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.