Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backbone cabal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:06, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Backbone cabal

Backbone cabal (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I'm surprised this article has even existed for five years, given the poverty of sourcing. Mark H Wilkinson (t, c) 14:45, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep notable group in history of Usenet, itself notable in history of Internet. Article may need cleanup, but it is not some kind of hoax or NN-cruft; see http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/cabal-conspiracy-FAQ/ from 7 Sep 1995 (!). Eleland 15:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep. Wow, the whippersnappers today know nothing of the internet if they think this isn't important enough to warrant an article. And poor sourcing is a reason to improve the article, not delete it. Tarc 20:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per above, defnitely a notable group.--JForget 02:08, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Notability well-established, hoax or triviality not possible, extremely important for the history of Usenet and the Internet. Take it to cleanup, would you? --Kizor 09:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep for reasons given above. Definitely notable in Usenet history. --Cybercobra 19:49, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. In this case WP:SELFPUB applies. Encyclopedic value about the USENET. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 16:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, certainly notable, may need some sourcing though (there are plenty of them out there). Melsaran (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.