Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baccra
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Deleted and redirected to Music of Jamaica. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:25, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] baccra
no sources. 1 sentence long. doesnt link. sad excuse for an article Kennykane 05:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NN. Michael 07:47, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. If it is unsourced, it needs sources, it certainly looks verifiable after a quick look through Google. If its a stub, tag it or expand it. If it doesn't link, make links. BTW: Music of Jamaica links there. WP:NN is an essay not a guideline or policy. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, redirect Music of Jamaica has the same information and a bit more, and I just added the one link to its refs. I would have no objection to some baccra fan expanding this. But how likely is that? Also, I removed the Baccra link from MoJ -- why cause users to link over to see a rephrase of what they've just read??? Bustter 11:39, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Comment This is ofcourse a self fulfilling prophecy. Removing the only link to the article, making it an orphan article while the AfD just started, will cause even less people to visit the article and decrease the chance it will ever be expanded. We've got a lot of stubs here on Wikipedia and a stub makes it easier for the casual reader to add suitable information to Wikipedia. For now, I will replace the removed link. If the conclusion of the AfD is to delete, I will be the first to remove it again. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 12:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Rangek 13:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete: Does not appear to meet WP:MUSIC. --Hetar 04:06, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.