Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Christmas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all--JForget 23:59, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Baby Christmas

Baby Christmas (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I know people don't like mass nominations, but these are of a sort and basically suffer the same ills from the same artist(s). They are a bunch of compilation albums, without sourcing to show any notability, all fail WP:MUSIC - the producer's bio was deleted as nn a while ago, but there are literally dozens of these sorts of mixes of common songs/instrumentals recorded by nn people and mass marketed - not notable WP:N. Yes, Bach, Mozart, Beethoven, and the Christmas songs are notable, but these particular recordings etc. of them aren't.

I am also nominating:

Carlossuarez46 22:30, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete all absurdly unjustified forest of articles. As some of these have apparently been reviewed, it might be possible to have one combination article on the concept or the series. Let's quickly complete the AfD and get rid of these. I don't say merge or redirect since they don't seem worth the linking. DGG (talk) 00:35, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete All A wast of space noting secial!!! Yourname 01:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all. The producer may have been worth having a page for (but I presume not, trusting the judgment of those who deleted it since I haven't read it) but the individual CDs certainly aren't worth a thing. CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:52, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all Badly written advertisements. Should the Raimond Lap article be speedy deleted, or go thru AfD? (Yikes! what is happening to me? I don't think anything should be deleted,much less speedy deleted.) As to why deleted the articles. The records (CDs/whatever) are indistinguishable from each other, and from the plethora of other compilations in the same genre. I don't see any way to salvage them. jonathon 00:13, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all. I too hate mass nominations, but oh well, this is the rare exception. Burntsauce 16:22, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all as per above, promo. -R. S. Shaw 19:50, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.