Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babu Subramaniam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Singularity 01:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Babu Subramaniam

Babu Subramaniam (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I removed a prod [1] because I think the article itself, in a way, asserts notability, purely because of where this person has worked. If I'm wrong, so be it...but better safe then sorry! Giggy ^{Talk | Review} 02:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. I think he is unquestionably notable and really deserves a better article. If I had the time I would do it tonight. As is, I might get to it tomorrow. Plenty of ghits and easily sourced in my thinking. JodyB _{yak, yak, yak} 03:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

  I'd be happy to also do some work on it...just wanted consensus to see if it's worth it :) Giggy ^{Talk | Review} 04:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. Such heavy involvement in such well-known and long-running television programs is notability for sure. It's not a great article as it stands, but I'd rather see the article on a Star Trek director improved than the article on a Star Trek character. Consequentially 08:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep, should never have been prodded. —Xezbeth 11:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: Well known, multiple-award winning director.  RGTraynor  18:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep as per the above reasoning. --xDanielx^Talk 23:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above reasoning. Mathmo ^Talk 04:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.