Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babes of Broadway

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 12:18, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Babes of Broadway

The article only contains a thumbnailed picture. No info at all. Kross 15:31, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete for above reasons.--Kross 15:35, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete We are told that it is a "One-shot pin-up comic", but there is no indication to its notability. Sonic Mew 15:43, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as article with no content. -R. fiend 15:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy. No content. Article created by a newbie who seems to have disappeared (no edits since May 26), so I think it's kind of a newbie mistake - created an article due to a redlink and thought that book cover images are appropriate articles. Check out Broadway Comics. This is the parent article (and, frankly, possibly another VfD candidate; company existed for one year 10 years ago (although I haven't (sorry) the time or energy to research this or list it)). Another linked article is another cover image and is CSD'd. Soundguy99 17:03, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Changing vote - OK, fair enough, DS1953 added some content so it's no longer a speedy, but I now think (after doing some research) that a Merge and Redirect to Broadway Comics would be appropriate. I mean, c'mon guys, it's a one-shot pin-up; what kind of article could possibly be written? B'way Comics is definitely keepable, but it's short, and IMHO merging all of the stuff in the subsidiary series articles would be a nice way to expand it. Soundguy99 16:05, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• I added a couple of sentences of content to put it into context so its now a stub, but I am not voting. DS1953 18:43, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep DS1953 03:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as a stub as expanded by DS1953. Legitimate comic from a legitimate company (which was run by the same company behind Saturday Night Live incidentally). Certainly it's no longer a speedy candidate IMO now that there is some content. 23skidoo 20:47, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as stub. Meelar (talk) 23:42, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep new version - nice turnaround. Ah, the magic of vfd... -- BD2412 ^talk 05:03, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC)
• Keep rewritten version. Well done DS1953. JamesBurns 05:58, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.