Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babble

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was move, I think it make sense and nobody is calling for deletion. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, contribs, odometer) 02:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Babble

Unsourced article about a VoIP provider of which I have never heard even though I have an office in Docklands. No evidence of significance per WP:CORP. Guy (Help!) 18:31, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 11:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

• Well, I've heard of it, which just goes to show that having an office in Docklands is no guarantee of anything! Emeraude 12:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep per the following results: 104 news articles and over 220,000 ghits. I will try to incorporate some of the sources into the article presently. -- Black Falcon 22:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
  • I am changing to weak keep as most of the 100 new sources are subscriber-only or pay-to-view. I still feel that the subject of the article is notable, but as I cannot access the sources, I cannot confirm their reliability, independence, and non-triviality. If someone can access and comment on them, I may again change my position (toward keeping or deleting). -- Black Falcon 22:26, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Perhaps it would be better to simply redirect this page to Babble (disambiguation) and preserve the edit history in case anyone does have access to the sources and chooses to expand the article in the future ... -- Black Falcon 22:28, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Prodego ^talk 23:37, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 07:57, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral; if keep, rename to Babble (company). Babble should redirect to Babble (disambiguation) since it hasn't been established that this company's name is the primary use of the word. What does it say though that the google news results are private? Many are copies of each other, inflating the number of results, and they look more like press releases about the company's products than substantial reports of the company itself. –Pomte 15:35, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Move to Babble (company) and then move Babble (disambiguation) to here. Crotalus horridus (TALK • CONTRIBS) 19:54, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.