Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BXML (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete both Sceptre ^(Talk) 10:40, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BXML and Backbase

Both articles were originally tagged with {{afd}} without comment. They are both apparently renominations. The prior deletion discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BXML. The prior deletion discussion for Backbase can be found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backbase. I believe that they are somehow related because Backbase currently redirects to BXML. I am correcting the nomination for BXML and removing the listing for Backbase pending a renomination following the procedures at WP:RFD. Abstain. Rossami (talk) 03:27, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. 500+ Google hits for BXML indicates lack of notability for a computer topic. Johnleemk | Talk 06:03, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Werdna648^T/_C\^@ 09:48, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delte advert. Stifle 21:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and rename to Backbase. I've heard enough references to Backbase while discussing AJAX Framewoeks to assume that it's reasonably noteable, and I don't see why the company or the product shouldn't have an entry. Possibly the bar for notebaleness has been set a little high here because of it's connection with contentious subjects (AJAX etc). --Artw 01:57, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.