Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BWitty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 01:38, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] BWitty

BWitty (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails notability. The sole output of this company appears to be an online noteboard service that carries no advertising. Vanity article as per Amit Avner. TreveX^talk 17:39, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment This nomination was misfiled at the top and moved to its correct chronological position by Flyguy649^talk_contribs 18:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment This article has already been deleted on the Hebrew Wikipedia [1] TreveX^talk 01:43, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Comment The Hebrew article lacked a lot of information. This article describes the Internet company that was mentioned in a few newspapers. Should keep it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.178.16.62 (talk) 20:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC).

• Delete per nom. - Aagtbdfoua 00:24, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Quarl ^(talk) 08:39, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, also the deletion tag on the article was removed by an anon editor, so be on the look out.--Joebengo 18:33, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Rgds, - Trident13 20:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It - Userful data in my opinion. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.56.215.67 (talk) 12:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.