Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BVS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep in a somewhat speedy manner, the disambig is used for several articles. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 20:19, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BVS

Delete all link is a red links. this page is not disambiguation. Zanghgn 05:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Interesting, almost a speedy delete A3 for only having links, but none of the links in this dab page go anywhere. We delete empty categories, should the same follow for an empty dab page? --Daniel Olsen 06:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

I think we might call this housekeeping, since csd g6 covers disambiguation pages with only one link. Then again, maybe not. MER-C 07:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, speedy if possible. MER-C 07:24, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - now a useful disambiguation page with many blue links. MER-C 12:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• A blue link was added to the list, so I suggest a redirect to that one page, preserving the history as a start for a dab page later. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 11:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep normal disambiguation. Sasha l 14:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep; there are now three blue links. —Caesura^(t) 16:13, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep and remove the redlinks and their links (which may be linkspam) ColourBurst 16:19, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep disambig. Veinor (ヴエノル) 23:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.