Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BOCTAOE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 02:05, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] BOCTAOE

Self-confessed protologism. -- RHaworth 19:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable. Ritchy 19:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism. Protologisms may deserve listing at Wiktionary:List_of_protologisms. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 22:53Z
• Weak delete. Not really notable. Merge to Dilbert if desired. Stifle 16:41, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. A merge is an idea though. (Somebody just blanked this page) Banes 11:41, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. No reason to delete, though moving to wiktionary is also possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.96.11 (talk • contribs)
• Delete --NaconKantari 20:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Or Move Merge with Dilbert or Move to Wiktionary
• Merge Or Move Merge with Dilbert or Move to Wiktionary User:Pault 15 January 2006
• Merge Or Move Merge with Dilbert or Move to Wiktionary. I created this entry. I believe consensus has been reached. Ringbark 22:44, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.