Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BANTAM STAMP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merged, thanks Tim Ross. Canley (talk) 12:06, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] BANTAM STAMP

BANTAM STAMP (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable art.; copied word-for-word? Rapido (talk) 23:10, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete-per nomTrUCo⁹31¹ 02:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - grounds for deletion is that it is non-notable art? Although the article is badly written, it's fairly clear that it is talking about postage stamps. Sources for notability for this type of stamp would likely come from more specialized magazines on stamp-collecting. -- Whpq (talk) 17:18, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge into Postage stamps and postal history of India, where it should fit neatly, assuming there is not copy problem. Tim Ross·^talk 17:20, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Merge- I agree with the reasons Tim Ross stated above.Tnxman307 (talk) 21:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. I just merged the contents of BANTAM STAMP into Postage stamps and postal history of India#Twentieth century. I'll be happy to reverse the process if there is objection. There is no longer a purpose for BANTAM STAMP. Tim Ross·^talk 22:11, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - there is no explanation of what the article is about! Deb (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
• Endorse merge - Tim Ross' merge works fine (the single fact presented on the page is referenced, which makes it suitable for Postage stamps and postal history of India#Twentieth century). I doubt a redirect is needed, so the remnant page should be deleted. The Transhumanist 17:13, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.