Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Azlea Antistia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 04:59, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Azlea Antistia

Having attempted to research this subject, I've come to the conclusion that this article will just relist information found on both IAFD and IMDB. Azlea Antistia hasn't done anything notable, and is presently out of the industry. Therefore, I don't see any reason why Wikipedia should have an article on this subject. (And, as always, if something changes, we can always go in and readd the article.) Thus, delete. Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 01:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, real porn actress. User:Zoe|^(talk) 02:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, according to Excalibur Films, she's performed in over 200 videos. IMDB seems to be missing most of them, though. -- Kjkolb 03:38, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Pavel Vozenilek 04:21, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as per Zoe. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, but remove time sensitive characteristics, I'm afraid porn actresses can be notable and there's some bad reasoning in the nomination:

1. I've come to the conclusion that this article will just relist information found on both IAFD and IMDB. Wikipedia needs to restate info from other sources. Otherwise the article would not be verifiable.
2. and is presently out of the industry. Being dead or no longer working is no reason to remove an entry. People may still want to look it up. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:39, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Today's Azlea Antistia is tomorrow's 1970 Penthouse centerfold. Unless she has some reason for a biography other than her pornographic films or unless she is one of the few porn queens discussed in other media, we're talking about preserving a stage name, not a real name. I wish 200 porn films was a large number, but, with the video production of the porn industry now, it could represent two months of work in 15 shoots that have been recut and repackaged a number of ways. It is not sufficient to be "real" nor "verifiable": there must be something to discuss about the person. Geogre 19:04, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Agree with Zoe, actors with reasonably wide audiences and a large production are notable. Porn actors as well sadly. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, I agree with Mgm's very salient points. Disagree with Geogre, information is valuable in its own right - even when dicussion has ended. User:Paragon1976 00:37, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Who said she's out of the business anyway? Her own website states: "She got her start in the business to have some fun and has stayed because she loves it." wikipediatrix 21:21, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.