Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayana Angel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ayana Angel

Ayana Angel (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

NN porn star per WP:PORNBIO and generall WP:BIO standards, significance as a porn star not explained. Around 40 or so films according to IMDB. Very minor link to a scandal is not enough IMO. Contested PROD. Delete. Mangojuice^talk 01:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Concur with above. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud} 02:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for above reasons; only reference provided is the actor's blog Shaundakulbara 02:57, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 06:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep The 40 film level is light of the criteria for automatic inclusion; however, the football scandal and the TV interview add some degree of notability. We don't seem to have a criterion which clearly defines the synergy between multiple independent claims to notability, so what's the harm of includng her? --Kevin Murray 19:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia:Notability (pornographic actors). I also agree that the link to the Vikings scandel doesnt appear to be enough to satisfy WP:N generally. JCO312 20:02, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. NN and fails. SynergeticMaggot 22:09, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no evidence of notability. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.