The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Seems to be a science project which is not yet finished. Not verified or supported with references. Very laudable, but we should wait until it is finished at least.DJ Clayworth 18:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete Vanity at best, crystal balling and the like. Even if true it's not notable. Ben W Belltalk 18:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete not notable, ever. SchmuckyTheCat 19:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete, not verifiable (and completely nn of course).--Nilfanion (talk) 19:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per all of the above. Michael Kinyon 02:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.