Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviaction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus - there doesnt seem to be a clear consensus here, so the article is kept by default. -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 11:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Aviaction

Aviaction (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:V, can find no third-party reliable sources to give this magazine notability in an encyclopaedic context Russavia 09:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: Non notable magazine. Also, slightly resembles and advertisement. - Rjd0060 17:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as clear infringement of WP:SPAM. --Gavin Collins 09:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep: This is one of the first magazines that was launched in Pakistan about aviation, hence, I thought it was significant to have it as an article. If you have problems it being too much of an advertisement or spam, let me know how I can improve it. Thanks --Fast track 19:57, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
• KEEP: This article needs looking into, there is significance in it. --Greelight 19:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.