Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avena Lee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Avena Lee

Avena Lee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Doesn't pass WP:BIO. Epbr123 14:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k 14:59, 3 November 2007 (UTC)*
• Keep This article does pass WP:BIO. Under this section, it states that pornographic actors are notable if they have been featured in mainstream media multiple times. I think staring in over 100 films is suitable. Icestorm815 20:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Mainstream means non-porn. Epbr123 20:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Point taken. Delete That was the only reason I sided for keep. Following points are valid. Icestorm815 04:49, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Number of appearances as a measure of notability for pornographic actors has been abandoned - for a while this was in the list of "questionable criteria" for notability, then later revised to be "invalid", on the ground that "Pornographic films can be made in a few days, thus performers can appear in dozens of films per year". It does not appear in the current draft of Wikipedia:Notability (people)#Additional criteria. There is nothing in the Avena Lee articles which offers any assertion that she meets any of the general criteria for notability nor any of the specific criteria for pornographic actors. If she has been featured multiple times in mainstream media and someone can add reliable sources to that affect, then keep. --Stormie 23:06, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of notability found. No WP:RS cited. • Gene93k 01:09, 4 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. No notability, no coverage, no interest. Valrith 22:00, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Tabercil 23:50, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.