Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autonomous Mapping Evaluation and Evasion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Red Planet (film), consensus is that it that it not independently notable but a merge is possible. Davewild (talk) 20:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Autonomous Mapping Evaluation and Evasion

Autonomous Mapping Evaluation and Evasion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Main antagonist of Red Planet, sure; however, no notability outside that film. Fails WP:FICT. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 21:26, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

• Make smaller and merge to Red Planet; it'd be a pity to lose this work altogether. Cel ^{Talk to me} 22:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Merge a little bit of it into Red Planet (film) per Cel. Most of it seems to be plot summary and unsourced, though, so that ought to be fixed first. If a merge is not realistic (or if sources cannot be found), delete. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 22:13, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I created the page simply because i believed that perhaps some viewers of the film would feel the need to know more about the ideas contained in it's script. We live in a world fueled by technology and many of us look towards the future in order to imagine the conception of machines such as AMEE, and seeing an advanced robotic life form would urge them to discover more about how it works, and about it's "attitude". After seeing the page for the Red Planet film, i noticed that the information given on the AMEE character was quite superficial, as was the information given in the film itself. With a page for the character in general, people could find out more about it and on how it functions, and therefore understand exactly how a conception of a robot could truly become a human creation in the future, which is why i thought that it's page had a use. However, if the Wikipedia Staff have decided that there is no true need for the page to exist, even after various editings and changes, I believe that i must simply accept that. If anyone else believes that this page has a right to stay, feel free to address your opinions. --TøM (talk) 09:55, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.