Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autominer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Sango123 17:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Autominer

gamecruft. Artw 01:20, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Already covered in RuneScape. --IslaySolomon 01:22, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to RuneScape -- Librarianofages 02:01, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • comment withdrawn, vote=Delete -- Librarianofages 02:02, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Merge salvagable info (i.e. that they need not be at the computer). It's basically covered at RuneScape. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 02:10, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, redundant to topic covered in RuneScape. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I think it gets a sentence in the main RuneScape article, but it certainly doesn't deserve it's own article. P.S. (It is RuneScape with a capital S) J.J.Sagnella 06:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Thanks. I'll keep that in mind. :P --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 09:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 15:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per redundent. --Domthedude001 18:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and redundant. -- Alias Flood 22:06, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This info doesn't deserve its own article. --Ted87 23:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete These programs was very popular back when they worked, but quite obsolete these days. I doubt anybody will need an article on this. – Ðra 00:01, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.