Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automatic restroom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; editorial decision taken to redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 15:30, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Automatic restroom

712 Ghits, most of which are for automatic restroom accessories. I see no evidence that this term is in widespread usage, or indeed that fully automated restrooms are in widespread usage. The superloo is as close as we get, I guess. Probably original research, given the content nd lack of sources. Just zis Guy you know? 21:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn neologism --Mmx1 21:58, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • You're stupid.The words "automatic" and "restroom" are not neogolisms and so this can't be a neogolism. Its not a neogolism anymore than bad Wikipedia is. Booking563 23:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC) http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bad-wikipedia&btnG=Google+Search

"neogolism" was a typo for "neologism".

• Thanks for the compliment. Please be civil. Neologism can be an expression, like charter-jet conservatism. --23:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete because my wikibreak is over and it's time to delete stuff! Oh yea, nn too. --BWD ^(talk) 22:33, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable. The restrooms where I work are automatic. Quintillion 23:42, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
  • User has 7 edits, possibly a sockpuppet of User:Booking563 - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
    • User keeps attempting to remove Mike Rosoft's comment --Mmx1 17:28, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
    • Note to the user trying to remove Mike's comment: I don't know whether you're a sock or not... but the way you've removed the comment twice is not going to convince anyone that you're not a sock. Please don't be disrespectful to other editors and expect them to respect you for censoring their comments. If you have objections to a comment, don't meddle with it, type in your own response. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 12:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to washroom and add a note there about any fully automatic ones. — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:19, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, as a way to access articles on the various automated bathroom fixtures. StuRat 01:09, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable. I've expanded it some. FroogolShopping 02:18, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • User has 14 edits, possibly a sockpuppet of User:Booking563 - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and above delete votes. There's no such thing as an "automatic restroom," though there are clearly automatic accessories for restrooms. Esquizombi 02:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. 152.163.100.8 03:23, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Unregistered user, AOL IP address. - Mike Rosoft 23:12, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to washroom, mention automatic toilet accessories there. - Mike Rosoft 23:06, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Noisy | Talk 18:14, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Complete bollocks if I've ever seen it. Just because the plumbing is automatic doesn't make the restroom automatic. Or does it unzip my pants for me, too? --Rory096 17:44, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.