Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoerotic asphyxiation

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was unanimous keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 10:01, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Autoerotic asphyxiation

This was on Speedy Delete which was (rightfully) opposed on its talk page. I think this article should be kept but decided to put it on VfD since it was on Speedy Delete CunningLinguist 07:16, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keep or possibly merge with Erotic asphyxiation. A much talked-about sexual deviancy (I can use POV terminology here because this isn't an article) which has led to some notable deaths. —Wahoofive (talk) 07:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Kappa 08:29, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for the reasons I already stated at the article's talk page. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 09:45, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:23, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Gives definition and expands on it. Also provides links to related articles and is well sourced. Don't see any reason to delete it. Wikipedia isn't censured. Mgm|^(talk) 19:21, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia isn't censored. I dare say that sometimes it ought to be censured. :-) --TenOfAllTrades (talk/contrib) 20:01, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, valid term. RickK 20:46, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep — notable for the deaths it has caused, among other things. — RJH 20:49, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - has numerous legal issues and notable deaths. -- Jonel 22:37, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - notable concept. Blackcats 07:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep --michael180 18:22, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.