Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auto-erotic performer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Auto-erotic performer

This article is both short and completely unreferenced, and the second part of the article reads like someone's wish-fulfilment sexual fantasy. I've done a quick search for supporting cites, and come up blank. Unless someone can come up with evidence to support either or both parts of this article, I suggest that the unverifiable material be deleted; and if there's nothing left, which seems probable, that the whole article be deleted. -- The Anome 15:30, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete; fails WP:V. — pd_THOR | =/\= | 15:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I suspect this is real, but without references...--Chaser T 17:09, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

*Weak Keep with cleanup: I'm well out of my element in this discussion, but CFNM seems to be a documented article -- although the quality of that verification might need checked in turn. Because of the nature of the industry and the BDSM community (with which these topics have some, but not complete, overlap), it is going to be difficult to find wholly mainstream documentation. Regardless, if the other article's quality is able to stand, this one needs extensive cleanup; if it cannot grow beyond what it links to, Merge it instead. Serpent's Choice 06:29, 22 July 2006 (UTC) (retagged after signin to avoid appearance of sockism)

  • Reconsidered after my own efforts to research and improve this article. All Google hits are WP and mirrors. Nothing I can find referred to Stryker or The Gerogerigegege uses any term remotely like this one. There is a real CFNM sex underculture community (CMNF, also), but none of the references that I could find in that culture make use of this wording. In short, the phenomenon is real, but the term is not. This topic is adequately covered by CFNM, CMNF, Exhibitionism, and their related links. Delete per WP:NEO as a protologism. Serpent's Choice 12:13, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.