Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian anti communist organization
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.--cj | talk 01:07, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Australian anti communist organization
Suspected hoax. The article is very light on details and the references do not support the article content. Mattinbgn/ talk 08:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - almost definitely a hoax. -- Chairman S. Talk Contribs 08:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - nearly certainly conclusively an alleged hoax. The number of weasel-words is notable. The links are wonky. The CIA fact book is not at that URL, but a .gov one. Another link goes to a cattle outfit? Another goes to a Latter Day Saints site? Oh, and the author likes conspiracy theories "... For this page is an excellent reference ...". Shenme 10:54, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Hoax. --Folantin 11:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.RaveenS 16:40, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Most likely hoax. Also, in Australia they are writing it "organisation". HagenUK 21:01, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. There would be a much stronger claim for retention of this article if this anti-communist "organization" had an actual name not to mention references from verifiable sources verifying its content. Capitalistroadster 00:28, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 00:32, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, the poor spelling and grammar in this article are bad enough, the fact that it's almost certainly a hoax is peripheral to me. Lankiveil 10:02, 23 March 2007 (UTC).
- Delete for any and all of the reasons given above.--Roisterer 10:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Patent nonsense. Moreschi Request a recording? 12:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.