Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aussieschoolmates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was Delete ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 03:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aussieschoolmates

Spam. Artw 00:36, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Spam - Australian google hits are very low:[1]. [2]--IslaySolomon 00:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Totally WP:NN and WP:SPAM DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{WHAT I MESSED UP} 00:50, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above, fails WP:WEB. SM247^{My Talk} 01:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete for failing WP:WEB. Pascal.Tesson 01:44, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Islay and WP:WEB. — ዮም (Yom) | contribs • Talk • E 01:58, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. In addition to the Google hits, no reports on this site in the Australian media that I can find so definite problems with WP:WEB. Capitalistroadster 02:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, not very significant... Michael 03:24, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Capitalistroadster 02:53, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:WEB. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. It appears to be spam. --Roisterer 04:09, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spamish orphan article. —Pengo 09:07, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 15:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per advertising and nom. --Domthedude001 17:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per IslaySolomon.--Andeh 19:31, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Spam - Alias Flood 21:43, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:36, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.