Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auslogics Disk Defrag

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 09:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Auslogics Disk Defrag

Auslogics Disk Defrag (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable software. No third-party, reliable sources or independent media coverage. Only claim of notability is that it received "4.5 stars on Download.com." A Google search shows no independent sources to verify the article. Delete. Boricuæddie 04:34, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep I think this article can be improved greatly. Try This search, without the underscores. There is a myriad of sources out there. Also, just to let you know, you proposed that this article be deleted, which means that you can't vote. Astroview120mm 04:44, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • This isn't a vote, it is a discussion. Its generally assumed that the nominator is for deletion (unless they state otherwise), so explicitly mentioning it really has no bearing on the discussion. As for the article, all those myriad of sources are really just download sites. I went through 6 pages before I found anything other then a release announcement or a download page, and that was a blog comment. No reliable sources to be found, thus failing WP:N, and Delete - CosmicPenguin (Talk) 05:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Downloads.com merely lists this program, and does not review it, which is not significant coverage Corpx 05:01, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't find any evidence of notability. MarkBul 05:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I also can't find any evidence of notability, possibly an advert? Darkcraft 09:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable, no third-party coverage. Thomjakobsen 15:51, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Barely notable. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:29, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.