Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurish Language

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 14:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aurish Language

I prod tagged this with the comment:

Firstly, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Secondly, this is by its own admission original research.

{{prod2a}} tag added by Cfred with the comment

Non-notable constructed language, no claim of any population of speakers..

Prod tag removed by author after (according to the edit summary) "improvements". I'm nominating this for deletion for the reasons I and Cfred stated, as the "improvements" don't address either point Tonywalton  | Talk 10:18, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Strong delete per nom, possibly qualifies for speedy A7. ~ Matticus78 10:30, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per nom. And - * sighs * - much as though I'd like to see this be speedied, A7 only applies to people or groups of people. Would that it were otherwise... Tevildo 10:59, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per nom. As noted above, the article does not meet criteria for speedy deletion, but it's so squarely in vanity/original research that there's no reason to keep it. —C.Fred (talk) 12:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment Some of the more progressive admins have been G3'ing this sort of thing; it would be _better_ if A7 were to be expanded, but I'm sure we can trust the system to reach the right result one way or another. ;) Tevildo 12:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, made-up stuff. NawlinWiki 13:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, made-up language. Fails WP:NOR. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 00:24, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete the cruft is strong with this one. Danny Lilithborne 01:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.