Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aura of Goodness

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:48, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Aura of Goodness

Aura of Goodness (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

zero ghits, not encyclopediac, unsubstantiated Magichands 19:29, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete unless I am added to the list. (Mahatma Gandhi, Oprah Winfrey, Bill Gates, and Warren Buffett have an aura that indicates that they are spiritually and mentally advanced. This strikes me as close to the heart of original research.) - Smerdis of Tlön 19:49, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The term 'aura of goodness' seems to be thrown around a lot, but this article does not appear to be the definitive word on it. It does look like plain old garden-variety original research. -- Donald Albury 20:24, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete unless sourced (which seems unlikely). This seems to be original research. Trebor 20:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete with all speed and haste as per nom. Madmedea 21:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - This article provides no verifiable sources to establish notability. With all due respect to civility, this article is also bullshit. Shaundakulbara 06:00, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Going along with the verifiability issue, unless a scientific test for auras (of goodness or otherwise) is developed, any entries would be either a consensus of individuals who happen to like the person, or the editors' personal opinions. I don't see any way it can be maintained with reasonable neutrality. ◄Zahakiel► 20:15, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as OR, and non-verifiable. -- Pastordavid 11:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.