Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audioscape
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 21:35, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Audioscape
Reads like an advertisement, with no objective references (ie. all provided links sing the praises of the product). JuJube (talk) 18:37, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Audioscape is not a product. It is a research project exploring an area which is relatively new: 3D audio modeling for music performance and listening. The text will evolve over the following two weeks. as it is indeed in a synthesis from our research texts. Regarding the provided links, they are strictly documentation of our research, or artworks. I do not understand at all how they can be regarded as "singing praise" of a product. I suggest taking a closer and more considered look at the text. zkonateZkonate (talk) 23:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Note Zkonate is the author of the article in question. JuJube (talk) 00:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, weakly, and without prejudice. Frankly, I suspect conflict of interest issues are the largest problem here. The article's lead:
Audioscape is an open source research project, exploring 3D audio modeling for live music performance. It provides a framework for immersive spatial audio performance, where a user's body can be modelled within a virtual 3-D world, and the propagation of audio is computed based on acoustic physical modelling. This framework is among only a few that have explored virtual environments from the perspective of music and digital signal processing (DSP). It is an interactive and perceptually engulfing experience that causes users to feel like they are inside of an artwork or instrument.
sounds interesting, but is also extremely vague and abstract, and gives me no sense of the hardware needed to perform in this environment or to listen to it. The article gives credit to the Canadian Council for the Arts, among other donors, so this may have some documentable notability. But I fear that someone less connected to it would write about it better and more clearly. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 16:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC) - Delete, no independent verification of notability. Mukadderat (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
