Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atomic Betty (character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all. Redirect at your pleasure. Kurykh 00:56, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Atomic Betty (character) et al

Atomic Betty (character) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fictional character; article is 100% in-universe content, no assertion of real-world notability, no sources other than the TV show's website Stormie (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Also nominating:

Sparky (Atomic Betty) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Robot X-5 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Admiral DeGill (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Maximus I.Q. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Minimus P.U. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Noah Parker (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Paloma (Atomic Betty) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Penelope Lang (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Same deal, other characters from same show. --Stormie (talk) 23:23, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect to Atomic Betty; it looks like the info has already been merged. Ben Standeven (talk) 03:07, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep for now I don't believe consensus actively exists on things like this. Wait until latest meta-discussions finish. Hobit (talk) 08:22, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• delete for now - not notable. --Jack Merridew 10:19, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all - These articles are uncyclopedic. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 12:51, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom (talk) 17:47, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all per WP:FICT. Eusebeus (talk) 14:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all or redirect. List of characters in Atomic Betty is already doing a fine job. – sgeureka ^t•c 14:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect all to the list. No evidence of any substatial outside-of-the-show references. Thus, for this reason, they lack the notability as stand alone articles. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 21:40, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.